## Teaching vectors

Posted by David Zaslavsky on — CommentsI’ve noticed that (many of) my intro-level physics students, who have typically just learned about vectors within the past year, have a hard time working with them in equations. For example, given an equation like \(\sum\vec{F} = m\vec{a}\), I’ll typically think of the force vectors in a geometrical representation, as arrows. Vector addition is done by starting each vector from the endpoint of the previous one in the sum, and scalar multiplication just means scaling the length of the arrow. But almost invariably, whenever I try to walk a student through this representation, they don’t get it. It seems like they’re really not prepared to accept the idea of doing math on things that they can’t plug into their calculators.

What I’ve found to work is this: I tell the students that whenever they see a vector equation, write one copy of it for each dimension. Newton’s second law, for example, becomes a set of three: \(\sum F_x = m a_x\), \(\sum F_y = m a_y\), and \(\sum F_z = m a_z\). That way, all they have to deal with are simple numerical equations. Sure, they miss out on understanding the true nature of vectors (at least for now), but these intro courses are very results-driven, and at some point, learning things “the right way” has to take a back seat to getting the problem to work out. Otherwise you get nowhere.